Don Cheadle writes copy for the Marantz SR4320

PostJan 3rd, 2006 | Comments (5)
After coming across a post at Gizmodo about how Marantz is introducing a bunch of new stuff at CES, I headed over to Marantz's website and came across the SR4320 Stereo Receiver. The copy for the product description sounds like it was written by Buck Swope from Boogie Nights. Drop a couple "Hi-Fi's" in there, and it's a done deal.



1) "Stereo Receiver"
I'm pretty sure companies stopped making mono receivers 20 or 30 years ago. It's 2006, boys, you can just call it a "receiver" now.

2) "Stereo Receiver with A/V switching capabilities"
This is a bit redundant. "Switching" is what receivers do. This is not a feature per se. It's like selling a car with "driving capabilities."

3) "AM/FM Tuner With Frequency Direct Access"
Translation: You no longer have to tune in stations manually with a big knob. Again, this has been a standard for quite some time now, Marantz.

4) "New Full Function Remote Control"
This is my favorite. Not sure which I love more, the fact that they're advertising that their receiver comes with a remote control, or that they refer to it as a "full function" remote. It's good to know Marantz isn't shipping receivers with their old "partial function" remotes I guess.

The product page for the SR4320 seems to be an anomaly, because all the other product pages sound like the copywriter is actually from this century. I just hope Marantz doesn't go to CES and start touting their new "Disc-based Cinema Player" and "Color Televisions."

Comments

andrew tibbettsJan 4, 2006
actually, i have a cd player/radio that has a remote that doesnt have buttons for tuning or function switching. you might read 'full function' as 'they wouldnt have buttons that dont function' but i, on the other hand, have to get out of bed and slide around on socks to avoid the freezing floor so that i might switch from cd to radio...
Jamie TibbettsJan 4, 2006
actually, i have a cd player/radio that has a remote that doesnt have buttons for tuning or function switchin

The only difference is, Marantz makes high-end audio equipment. The SR4320 is their low-end receiver and still retails for $429.99. A full-featured remote isn't an option.
andrew tibbettsJan 5, 2006
aaaaaahh.. douche baggery.
Kim TeoJun 16, 2006
I do think Marantz is accurate on these 4 points.
1. It a Stereo (2 channel) receiver, not a Home-Theatre (more than 2 channels)
receiver. As a music lover, this makes a big difference.

2. Not all stereo (2 channel receivers) have video switching.
Some use it for music only. Some would like to use it with their TV's too.
Very important to know.

3. Frequency Direct Access. No all receivers have this - the ability to
tune a station by keying in the numeric frequency on the numeric keypad.
Such as 9-4-1 for 94.1

4. Full Function Remote. Not all receivers have controls for other components.
CD, DVD players, Tape recorders built into the remote.

It's your fault if you misinterprete. Not Marantz's.
JonathanJul 23, 2007
I own the Marantz, and it blows away anything in its class. I originally bought it with the Monitor Audio bronze series speakers, and I upgraded to the Monitor Audio GR20's. I thought for sure that I would need a new amp to get the best out of a $3000 pair of speakers. I tried out a few different amps in the 2k range, and I could not tell the difference between them and the Marantz. So here I am two years later with the Marantz powering my GR20's wanting to justify buying a higher end amp but unable to do so. Connected to the GR4320: Rotel CD, Technics Turntable (it has a phono input!), Monitor Audio GR20's bi-wired with Ultralink cable, Monster cables between components, and Monster power cleaner unit (getting clean power to the Marantz made a HUGE difference).

Post a comment

Name
URL
Email
Comment